A community devoted to healing and restoration through participation with&in the Relationship of God(F,S,S)!


Maximus The Confessor (c. 580-662)
Ambigua 7.22 — “The Word (Logos =Jesus) wills always and in all things to actualize the mystery of His embodiment.”
"Βούλεται γὰρ ἀεὶ καὶ ἐν πᾶσιν ὁ τοῦ Θεοῦ Λόγος καὶ Θεὸς τῆς αὐτοῦ ἐνσωματώσεως ἐνεργεῖσθαι τὸ μυστήριον."
This is the single most important Greek line for the idea that the Incarnation is not a one‑time event but a mode of existence that transforms humanity.
“The Word of God (Jesus), who is God, wills always and in all things to actualize the mystery of His embodiment [the Incarnation of the fullness of God(F,S,S) in human form].”
This is Maximus’s clearest statement that the Incarnation is ongoing, universal, and the very structure of reality — the foundation for the idea that Christianity is a new way of being human.
Think of "eternal" in the sense of existence outside of the construct of time, not a never-ending timeline that is endless in opposite directions (as in past and future).
Other Early Church Fathers (Leaders of the Early Church) Who Argued for Christ’s Pre‑Existing the Incarnation.
Below are the leaders who explicitly used these passages — John 1:1, John 8:58, Col. 1:17, Micah 5:2, Hebrews 1, etc. — to argue that Christ is eternally divine and uncreated.
1. Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202) Most explicit early witness. Irenaeus repeatedly cites:
- John 1:1–3 - John 8:58 - Colossians 1:16–17
- Old Testament theophanies to argue that Christ existed before creation, appeared to the patriarchs, and is the eternal Son. Examples from the search results:
- “The Word existed with the Father before all creation.”
- “The Son, eternally with the Father, is Himself God.”
- Christ appeared to Moses in the burning bush as ‘I AM’ (John 8:58 connection).
2. Justin Martyr (c. 100–165)
Justin uses:
- John 1:1
- Genesis 1:26 (“Let us make man…”)
- The Angel of the LORD passages to argue that Christ existed before Abraham and appeared in the Old Testament. He explicitly connects Jesus’ “I AM” (John 8:58) with the Angel of the LORD.
3. Tertullian (c. 160–225) (Western Church Father who, unfortunately, contributed to the idea of God being retributive.)
In 'Against Praxeas,' Tertullian uses:
- John 1:1
- John 8:58
- Colossians 1:17 to argue that Christ is eternal, not created, and distinct from the Father.
4. Origen of Alexandria (c. 185–253)
Origen is one of the strongest defenders of Christ’s eternal pre‑existence. He uses:
- John 1:1–2
- John 17:5
- Colossians 1:15–17
- Hebrews 1:2–3 to argue that the Son is eternally begotten, not made.
5. Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373)
In 'On the Incarnation' and 'Against the Arians', Athanasius uses:
- John 1:1
- John 8:58
- Colossians 1:17
- Hebrews 1:3
- Micah 5:2 to argue that Christ is eternal, uncreated, and co‑equal with the Father.
6. Gregory of Nyssa (c. 335–395)
Gregory uses:- John 1:1 - John 17:5 - Colossians 1:17 - Revelation 22:13 to argue that Christ is the eternal Logos and the Alpha and Omega.
7. Gregory Nazianzen (c. 329–390)
In his 'Theological Orations', he uses:
- John 1:1
- John 8:58
- John 17:5 to defend the Son’s eternal generation.
8. Cyril of Alexandria (c. 376–444)
Cyril uses:
- John 1:1–3
- John 17:5
- Colossians 1:17 to argue that Christ is eternal, not created, and shares the Father’s nature.
We are All learning to be human together, as God(F,S,S) has created us to be! And none of us are doing it perfectly.
"The Way of Jesus" is the revelation of who God(F,S,S) created us to be as humans.
It is the process of restoring our identity, that which the F,S,S created us to have. It may feel different to us, but it's not new. It is a way of being, not a way of doing. Our doing is the fruit of (flows out of) our identity (who we believe we are). Per the F,S,S's perspective, our doing (behavior) does not determine our identity; the F,S,S has already determined our identity for us (as revealed by the life of Jesus... and in his teaching, as exemplified in the parable of the prodigal son).
It is the revelation of the restoration (of our identity) in Jesus! This revelation is found in the entirety of the incarnation, not just on the cross. The Way is Jesus and is ancient in the same sense that Jesus is ancient, divine, eternal (outside of time), and uncreated. It is as ancient as it is the reflection of Jesus. Whom do we see when we look in the mirror? Do we see the identity of Jesus, or do we see the "I'm just a piece of shit" toxic version of the "gospel?" Many of us have been taught that we are totally depraved and that God the Father could not be in Jesus' presence on the cross because God(F,S,S)'s holiness would not allow him to be in the presence of sin. This is a gross misrepresentation of what is being said in Scripture about F,S,S. And yes, this toxic "gospel" is offensive to our Father for anyone, including ourselves, to believe anything negative about ourselves that is not what the F,S,S believes about us. As a parent, would you be offended if someone called your child a piece of shit?
It is also true that our unhealthy choices and behaviors (aka, missing the mark = "sin") are not without toxic consequences. In spite of our toxic thoughts, feelings, and behavior, Jesus, representing the fullness of F,S,S, is inviting us to see ourselves as the F,S,S sees us. Will F,S,S allow us to experience hell? Yes, we will all be salted by the fire🔥of God. The F,S,S's healing and restoration of us is not without refinement.
The purpose of the Cross: Jesus came to change our minds about God (and subsequently ourselves), not to change God(F,S,S)'s mind about us. The subsequent fruit of the change in our minds about God is the change in our minds about oursleves, which results in our healing & restoration.
The F,S,S has never needed or desired our sacrificial systems. The Old Testament sacrificial system was dramatically different from pagan sacrificial systems. This remediation begins in Genesis 15:17 and Genesis 22 as a foreshadowing of the differentiation between the pagan sacrificial systems and the Levitical system to come, but even more significantly in the foreshadowing of the end of all sacrificial systems as revealed with&in Jesus.
Micah 5:2, John (1:1-2,5 8:58, 17:5,24), Colossians 1:17, Heb 7:3, Rev 22:13, 1 John 1:1-2
If this is true for all of us, then what is "Church," and what is going to Church supposed to mean to us?
Let's start a discussion about what "going to Church" originally meant. Contrary to most of our experiences, it was originally not intended to be about "worshiping" God. Tom will talk about what attending Church meant to them and how understanding "worship" is different from our modern understanding of "worshiping" God. For them, "Going to Church" was focused on "edification," the building up of one another. Although our modern perspective of Church may include building others up, it is certainly foreign to us as it being the main purpose for attending Church.
To get started, go to one or all of the following:
-
Tom's YouTube Channel - www.youtube.com/@tomwadsworth
-
Tom's Website - www.TomWadsworth.com
-
www.bible-bridge.com/what-is-worshipThis written summary of Tom's work -
Tom is graduate of - https://www.tomwadsworth.com/answers-to-questions/about-tom-wadsworth :
Tom's YouTube Shorts - each is about 30-40 seconds
One Anothering or "worship."
-
Why does this matter?
-
The point is not that what we think of as "worship" is bad by any means. It is not about excluding "worship" as we have been conditioned to think about it. It is more about us understanding the context of the main reason for gathering together as believers.
-
The video is the briefest (33:07) explanation I have found so far.
-
The video below this one is a longer summary version which includes the content of this shorter video.
Why the Early Church Didn't Have Worship Services - 7 videos in 1 (1:12:32)
-
This video is the longer summary version which includes the content of the shorter video above.
Concerning a first-century One-Anothering gathering, take a look at this video below.
What did first-century gathering (assembly) look like? Start at the 25:50 mark.
Summary - see the 43:00 mark
Living a Life of Edification
-
If not mistaken, both Tom and Kent are Harding University graduates.
What is “One Anothering”?
In the video, “one anothering” means the New Testament pattern of mutual, two-way discipleship and care—not passively receiving from a leader, but actively participating in the community’s life by:
-
encouraging and strengthening one another
-
praying for one another
-
comforting one another
-
forgiving one another
-
teaching/admonishing one another
-
serving and bearing burdens for one another
In short: “One Anothering” = the lived practice of reciprocal love that builds the community up.
An essential component of successful One Anothering is to embrace first, seeing yourself as God(F,S,S) sees you, and second, seeing others as God(F,S,S) sees them.
"Church" as Edification:
In this video Tom and Kent discuss the heart of early Christian gatherings wasn’t “attending a worship service,” but edification as a lifestyle—a community practice where love is in charge and believers actively build each other up.
Key themes it develops:
-
Edification as the core purpose of gathering: The speakers contrast first-century assemblies (mutual strengthening) with modern church culture that can become pastor-centered and spectator-oriented.
-
Love as self-giving and multiplying: Because “God is love,” love is presented as something that naturally gives itself away and produces growth in others.
-
Kingdom mission framing: The community’s mission is described as bringing “the life of God to earth,” which should show up concretely in how people treat one another.
-
Edification language: They highlight the Greek concept often translated “edify” (building up/strengthening the household/community), emphasizing the church as a shared life, not an event.
-
Why many feel modern church is empty: People may leave when they don’t experience real mutual care and participation—because the model doesn’t cultivate everyday, shared “building up.”
-
Need for new structures (“new wine/new wineskins”): If the goal is mutual edification, communities may need different forms/practices than traditional service formats.
Ecclesia:
Kent treats the “ecclesia” not as a building, a weekly event, or a clergy-led production, but as the gathered people/community themselves—a living “household/family” of Jesus whose purpose is to embody God(F,S,S)’s life (love) together.
Practically, that means the ecclesia is:
-
A people, not a place: “church” isn’t something you attend; it’s a community you belong to.
-
A mutual-edification community: it exists to build one another up (what the video calls “one anothering”), not to create a one-way religious experience.
-
Distributed life and gifts: instead of being pastor-centered, it’s a body where participation, encouragement, teaching, care, and responsibility are shared across members.
-
A way-of-life ecosystem: the “church” is meant to be a recognizable social reality (shared practices, relationships, daily love), not just a meeting.
This lines up with how the video talks about edification as strengthening the “household,” and how “one another” practices are the normal operating system of the community.
Setting:
Kent is using “setting” to mean the concrete context that shapes a community’s shared life—the place and conditions in which “one-anothering” and edification actually happen.
In the video’s logic, “setting” includes things like:
-
Physical environment: where you meet and live (homes vs. church building, neighborhood layout, proximity, hospitality space, walkability, etc.).
-
Social environment: relationships, trust, safety, shared rhythms, how people spend time, who has access to whom.
-
Cultural/economic realities: schedules, busyness, commuting, financial pressure, technology habits—factors that can either make attention and love possible or constantly fragment them.
-
The “feel” and norms of interaction: whether the space and environment invite participation and vulnerability, or push people into passive consumption.
Why it matters for him: the “setting” can either support an edification lifestyle (easy to be present, share life, notice needs, participate) or work against it (anonymous crowds, performer/audience dynamics, limited relational access).
The Denominational "Us versus Them" Devide:
Aournd the 27 minute mark, Tom’s point is that many Churches unintentionally train people into judgment—creating a culture where members learn to evaluate and condemn those who don’t match their Church’s beliefs or behaviors.
His main thoughts:
-
This produces an “us vs. them” posture rather than a community centered on love and mutual upbuilding.
-
A judgment-shaped culture is at odds with the New Testament emphasis (as they’ve been describing it) on edification and “one another” practices—building people up in love and good works.
-
He adds that judging is a burden humans weren’t meant to carry; ultimately, that role belongs to God(F,S,S), not the community.
System:
For Kent, “system” is the shared way of relating and making decisions together that turns a group of individuals into a unified community. It’s the bridge where the “Story” (what we believe) and the “Setting” (where we are) meet in practical, cooperative action of individuals recognizing their identity with&in the Relationship of God(F,S,S). I will use the term, Oneship, as Jesus presented in honor of John 17:20-23
Key aspects of his definition:
-
Shared agreements: It’s the mutual understanding of who we are and why we are here. It’s not just about individual faith, but about a connected “us.”
-
“Love is a team sport”: Kent uses this phrase to push back against Western individualism. He argues that you can’t truly live out the way of Jesus alone; the “system” is the structure that makes mutual love possible.
-
The “Us Voices” vs. the “I Voice”: A healthy system prioritizes listening to the connected community and discerning together, rather than everyone just following their own individual desires or one person (like a pastor) dictating to everyone else.
-
Connected to Jesus and to each other discernment: It’s the practice of the ecclesia (the gathered people) learning to hear the Holy Spirit’s leading together.
-
A “New Wineskin”: He sees this shared, participatory system as the necessary structure (the wineskin) to hold the “new wine” of the Kingdom of God.
In short: System = the practical, relational “how-to” of being a community that discerns and acts as one.
Foundations is a separate page of this website. We are including One Anothering as a foundation of Jesus' faith in which He has invited us to participate!
In addition to the videos on Tom's YouTube channel -www.youtube.com/@tomwadsworth, below are a few additional videos associated with Tom's work that are not posted on his YouTube channel, or other presentations about home churches.
The major take-home points from Tom's work are the following:
-
"Going to Church" is not about us doing something for God(F,S,S), aka worship. It is us doing something for ourselves and as a result, doing something for each other, which is the F,S,S's sovereign desire. First and foremost, receiving from the F,S,S what the F,S,S has provided and invited us to accept and embrace is our participation. Only out of our receiving from God do we have the capacity to give to others. With this understanding, our gathering is about building one another up, to edify and encourage each other to see the F,S,S's presence that is with&in us. We cannot give what we have chosen not to receive.
Why has God(F,S,S) made it this way? Because this is the F,S,S's desires. It is the F,S,S's identity. It is what the F,S,S has created us for. This is our God-given identity, revealed by the incarnation of Jesus. Living in the Oneness of our identity produces the fruit of the Holy Spirit.
-
Jesus revealed a non-sacrificial system way to live with the F,S,S, and each other. Most religions, including the Christian religion, are focused, if not outright repeating, the sacrificial systems of pagans and the "reformed" sacrificial system God gave to Israel, which was meant to ultimately lead Israel out of all sacrificial systems. The "Way of Jesus" is not without "sacrifice," but it is without a sacrificial system. In the Way of Jesus, "sacrifice" is an other-oriented joyful giving.
The following videos present Early Church life & history on a variety of relevant topics.
An important theme: One of the major differences between the Eastern and Western Churches is a fundamental difference in perspective regarding God(F,S,S)'s character, nature, and identity. The Eastern perspective is closer to the analogy of F,S,S being like a hospital, where people go for healing and restoration, versus the Western perspective being closer to the analogy of a courtroom, where people are judged as good or bad and judgment is defined as retribution being required by God.
There is also the difference between the relationship being understood as a covenant versus a contract, with the Eastern perspective being the F,S,S, inviting us into a covenant, and the Western perspective being God requiring us to ask Jesus for a contract.
The covenant relationship that Jesus has invited us into is foreshadowed in Genesis 15:17 when the F,S,S puts Abraham to sleep and walks through the sacrifice without Abraham, which is a message that communicates, "I will cover (protect) you from the consequences of your failure (missing the mark).
“Cutting a covenant” (Hebrew idiom: "karat berit"). The F,S,S did not need nor require the sacrifice. So, why go through the ceremony with Abraham? Because Abraham understood what happened in this moment and the significance of the F,S,S, not allowing him to walk through the karat berit. The F,S,S knew Abraham needed it. The F,S,S did not need it. God provided it. This is also what happened on the cross. The fullness of God(F,S,S) incarnate (Jesus) made a similar covenant with all of creation, not just some of us.
GALLERY - Early Church Perspective
Scroll to additional images by clicking on the arrows > that show up when you move the cursor over them.
Double-click on the image to open it up.
Glimpses of how the Early Church understood God(F,S,S)'s nature and Scripture.
The fullness of the F,S,S in human form (Jesus) has restored all of us with&in the Relationship of the F,S,S. Those who are lost are those who have not yet received and embraced their invitation to be so. All of us will be salted by the fire of God(F,S,S). - Mark 9:49



